How Rwanda Judged it’s Genocide

“Since 2001, the gacaca community courts have been the centrepiece of Rwanda’s justice and reconciliation process. Nearly every adult Rwandan has participated in the trials, but lawyers are banned from any official involvement. Human rights organisations fiercely opposed the use of gacaca for trying genocide cases, on the grounds that it fell short of international legal standards of fairness. Much criticism
reflects legal rigidity towards the unprecedented challenges confronting post-genocide Rwanda – and a limited understanding of the aims of the community courts. Gacaca was inevitably imperfect, but also highly ambitious and innovative. While the full impact of the process will not be
apparent for many years, gacaca has delivered benefits to Rwandans in the spheres of justice, truth and democratic
participation. Other societies confronting the aftermath of mass conflict could learn much from Rwanda’s approach to local justice.”